Unitarian Universalist Meeting of South Berkshire

 

 

October 31, 2004

  

 

“A Trickster’s Treat:

Questions of the Minister

 

 

Rev. Kathy Duhon

 

           

            This is our annual sermon based on your questions to me.  As usual, you have asked some good ones, challenging questions.  Some are tricky, but all are treats.  Some are related to each other, so I will take similar ones together. 

            First, the questions about sermons:  How many sermons have you preached?  What are your three favorites?  What causes you to choose a certain topic?  Could you talk a little about sermons – that is, what guides the way you talk about a subject that moves it into the realm of religious or makes your treatment of it turn it into a sermon?

            I have preached over 400 sermons.  Trying to pick out favorite ones is tough, and I don’t think of the sermons in that way.  An ongoing surprise for me is that often the sermons I struggle with the most and am least sure about are the ones that you tell me have been most meaningful to you.  I’ll finish the service feeling I have let you down, only to hear over the next week that something of the Spirit has gotten through anyway, loud and clear, despite my inadequacies. 

            I have tried to remember a few recent sermons that I liked for various reasons.  In the sermon “Solomon’s Prayer for Wisdom”, I got to do Bible study, connect with another world religion that had a similar story, and reflect on Wisdom in general, all of which are the kind of study and reflection that I enjoy doing.  When I preached another sermon, “Fundamentalism is Not a Religion”, I didn’t enjoy the process at all.  I had to be prophetic, which is both scary and humbling, but also a calling that I must do at times.  Speaking prophetically implies that I have real Truth to impart, a difficult Truth, and despite wishing I could just be sweet and soothing all the time, sometimes I cannot help but be prophetic. 

Not all sermons are hard work.  I love the Easter sermons because I always start with a joke and end with renewed joy.  Another sermon, that is a favorite, came from the past and was very different from my usual writing – it wrote itself – the poem sermon I gave the Sunday after September 11th, 2001.  I’d written a regular sermon and then threw it away when those haunting and comforting words came tumbling out of me.    

            How do I choose topics?    Topics come to me from my readings, study, reflection, and spiritual practice.  They also come to me from your requests, and from the thoughtful ideas of the worship committee.  I try to maintain balance – reaching for different areas of subject matter, such as religious history, world religions, ethics, forgiveness, human development, scriptural study, gratitude, science and religion, healing, generosity. 

            How do I make a subject religious, turn a topic into a sermon?  This is the crux of the matter, something I do reflect upon and should undoubtedly think about more often.  We have such latitude in Unitarian Universalism that it is tempting to simply lecture, to reveal the passion I feel for any given subject, and think that you will be as excited as me to learn, for example, about the books of Kings, chronicling the political history of the Hebrew people, which I recently heard a great lecture on.  In the future, when I do speak to you about those narrative legends in First and Second Kings, however, it will be because of their truth-telling and transformative power, because they are stories that still can feed our lives. 

I believe that sermons are always meant to bring us closer to the great Reality, to the universals of the spirit, to the way of God.  Whether they are about peace and justice, or courage and hope, or faith and sacrifice, or love and healing, the words I convey, the words and emotions that come through me in a sermon, are supposed to be channels for the spirit to journey along on the Way.  The Way – that mysterious term in Taoism, early Christianity, mystical Judaism, Native American Spirituality, and other religious contexts – is more universal than the word God, and yet conveys the same sense of yearning and wonder.  We seek the Way through this life, and my sermons attempt to help.

How are you enjoying the empty nest?  Five years ago, as we sent our oldest off to college, I was heartsick, but the heart learns to let go.  Our three children are all in my thoughts and prayers every day, but I’m liking this next phase of less responsibility for them, and more time for other possibilities.  I feel blessed to be able to enjoy this new way of being with Jon.

As UUs how do we deal with fellow UUs who support policies and political candidates whose platforms and actions are contradictory to our UU values?  What are our UU values?  How can we define them?  Our principles are great, but very large in scope.  They include values like peace and justice, and the inherent worth and dignity of every person, but you will find folks who live those larger values out while supporting different policies.  Peace may mean no military conflict, or limited conflict that has a goal of peace.  Justice may mean working against the parts of the Patriot Act that threaten civil rights, or it may mean supporting a strong criminal justice system.  The inherent worth and dignity may mean opposing the death penalty or opposing abortion.  The above examples are sometimes conflicting, but people do begin with values that are deep and universal, and end up with different understandings of what they mean. 

As Unitarian Universalists, we vote democratically on resolutions and statements that are more specific, that do oppose the death penalty, support a woman’s right to choose, and support civil marriage for all, for example, but that is a democratic process, and not one of consensus.  We do not have a litmus test for membership, for example, that folks must support the resolutions and statements of conscience of the Unitarian Universalist Association.  We are called to accept our differences based on different interpretations of our shared values.  But not without a lot of ruckus.  Sometimes we work the hardest among ourselves to educate, persuade and enlighten each other, because we do have a common vocabulary and a shared understanding of religious values, and because we care so much.

Is there a spiritual bridge that unites all religions and could you define it?  How do you reconcile the contradictions of different faiths – for example, the Hindu idea of reincarnation and the Christian concept of Heaven?  And a similar pair of questions:  If there are diverse theological outlooks, how does the congregation manage this diversity?  What theological issues draw people together despite their differences?  Bridges and contradictions and diversity – the paradox of our religious life as Unitarian Universalists.  We are able to find great unities and speak out of the wisdom and nurturance of all religions, often noticing that the same value is in many traditions, but we do not always do well with specific theologies.  We are a living tradition that is wonderfully inclusive, but sometimes we exclude beliefs that are crucial to some of our members.  We are still learning how to be this amazing new kind of religion, Unitarian Universalism.

Are there contradictions among religions, or diversities in the congregation that are difficult?  Often the differences on a micro level disappear when the view is greater.  For example, I do remember that the Catholic priest in town several years ago said that there was no problem with believing in reincarnation and being a good Catholic – they were not mutually exclusive to him.  You could keep coming back in the cycle of life and karma, and still eventually reach heaven.  But actually, what I, or anyone else in our congregation, believe about God or death or war or responsibility or forgiveness, or whatever, is different from what anyone else believes.  Truly, if you go into the Congregational Church a few doors down, or Hevreh down the road, or to the Buddhist Sangha that meets nearby, and asked about one particular point of belief, even one for which there is a standard answer in that religion, you will find a multitude of expressions and differing beliefs.  We are each unique, each containing amazing wisdom and different lived experiences.  The differences, however, are all overshadowed by love.  As Francis David from 16th century Transylvania – the first to call his faith Unitarian – said, “In this world there have always been many opinions about faith and salvation.  You need not think alike to love alike.”  Hosea Ballou, an early American Universalist, said, “If we agree in love, there is no disagreement that can do us any injury, but if we do not, no other agreement can do us any good.”   Love is the bridge that unites all religions; love and acceptance are the keys to managing diversity in our congregation.

What meaning do you attribute to the lighting of the chalice in our service?  We light the chalice as a symbol of our religion, with its unity in diversity.  The words that go with the lighting of the chalice point to the many diverse directions in which our very open and inclusive symbol can go – to the warmth of love, the light of truth, the fire of justice, the spark of hope, the candle of peace, the beacon of faith, the chalice of being, the flame of Spirit.

How does your faith help you cope with loss and face death?  My faith is an anchor, not so much because of particular beliefs that comfort me, but in the basic premise that goodness and love are the ultimate and final reality and truth, which describes something of my belief about God.  God is Love, the ultimate power for goodness at the heart of the universe.  I always know deep down that all will be well.

How can we live with four more years of W. if he wins?  All will be well.  If we live now, fully engaged and seeking our values, we will reach the Promised Land.

Is there a UU take on death and the afterlife, and if so, what is it?  There are no prescribed views, nor any prohibitions; only a deep respect for each one’s very personal belief about what happens when we die.  People have a variety of understandings, based on faith, the experience with the death of loved ones, and any personal close encounters with near death.  With Unitarian Universalists, you are not alone, whatever you believe.

What is your opinion about the UUA President’s suggestion that we return to a “vocabulary of reverence”?  President Sinkford has asked us to dialogue about the religious language that we use, and to consider what we could agree upon in terms of “reverence”.  Religious language has never been an issue for us here.  We recognize diversity and accept a variety of sacred ways of expressing our religion.  We sometimes pray, meditate, chant, and do simple but meaningful rituals, from candle lighting to a variety of communions.  We speak with awe and wonder of the Mystery that we name differently, and we seek the Truth about the Ever Surprising Goodness at the heart of the universe.  We are happy with our vocabulary of reverence and gladly share it. 

Which part of your ministry is the most rewarding and the most difficult?  I love listening to the amazing wisdom of  you folks.  I am inspired by the ministry that we do together in service of the greater good.  So much is rewarding – what’s not to love here?  Finding the balance again and again is the difficult part, but how else could we dance?  I thank you for this great privilege of ministry to this congregation.  Amen.