Unitarian Universalist
Meeting of
“The Fifth Step Along the
Buddhist Path: Right Livelihood”
Rev. Kathy Duhon
Welcome to all of you who have taken
time out from your busy vacation schedules to spend some time at church. Someone once said, “A vacation is when you
pack seven suitcases, three small children, a mother-in-law, two dogs and say,
‘It’s good to get away from it all.’”
Well, those were the good old
days. Now you usually also pack the cell
phone and the laptop, and there’s no getting away from it all. May this time together in our service be a
sacred time when you can, at least for an hour, be at peace, let it all go. Today we look to
Buddhism in our sermon series on the Eightfold Path, a beautiful contemplation
of how to live in peace.
The Buddha was a teacher and a
physician of the spirit. He spoke of the
condition of life, its suffering and impermanence, and then he devised and
taught the practices that would bring health, happiness and compassion. The Buddha’s Eightfold Path, as Huston Smith explains,
is “a course of treatment”, which we have been examining. We have already considered the first four
steps, Right View, Right Intentions, Right Speech, and Right Action, and today
we move on to the fifth step along the Buddhist Eightfold Path, Right
Livelihood.
I know, I know, what a kick in the
pants to talk about work before Labor Day.
Our livelihood is the way we spend much of our time – what we are doing
in the world that guarantees our subsistence.
This is not necessarily a job that we get paid for, although that is the
common sense of the word. I like the
word which is used on various forms – occupation – how do we occupy our
time? Is it with compassion for ourselves and
others, being helpful and not harmful?
Right livelihood is the way we love the world while we work.
I remember a commercial from my
childhood appealing to stay-at-home Moms by noticing that they actually had
many occupations, and naming several of them, something like: she’s a cook, chauffeur, launderer,
peacekeeper, housekeeper, teacher, and Mom.
I believe the idea was that all that might give you a big headache or some
such, and they had just the right product to take care of you.
Most of us have many
occupations. We are gardeners and animal
caregivers, musicians and dancers, carpenters and mechanics, writers and
artists, chefs and coaches, teachers and child care workers, and all of the
above may be what we do without any pay.
Our occupation, our livelihood, is how we live in the world, in
interdependence.
What do we do for our
livelihood? This is a huge ethical
question that religious leaders of all kinds have addressed, the most important
recently being Pope John Paul II’s encyclical called,
“On Human Work”, dealing with issues of justice and meaning in our modern
international system for working.
In Buddha’s day, it would have meant
specifically the work that kept you alive, including monastic work. And he was clear that one’s livelihood, where
most of our waking attention is focused, needs to be carefully considered. All the meditation or spiritual practice done
in the morning before work, or else the prayers or chants done in the evening
after jobs are finished, have little relevance if one spends the greater part
of the day pulled toward what is harmful and unhealthy for oneself and the
world. Unitarian and U.S. President,
Thomas Jefferson, a man of many livelihoods, said, “It is in our lives, and not
from our words, that our religion must be read.”
To consider what livelihood we
engage in, as an ethical and religious question, is not always done. Seeking what the universe is calling for us
to do, that place, as Frederick Buechner has called
it, “where your deep gladness and the world’s deep
hunger meet”, is the way along any religious path to health, holiness, and
happiness. Unfortunately it is not
always very clear.
The Buddha tried to be clear in his
larger teaching, that we should be life promoting, not life destroying, in our
chosen livelihoods. How we occupy the
greater part of our days should be ethically based in living meaningfully, not
in making a living as an end in itself. The Buddha gave examples of occupations that
were not in line with spiritual practice, but his specific suggestions are as
time-bound as any religious leader’s.
You should not be a poison peddler, slave trader, prostitute, butcher,
brewer, arms maker, tax collector, or caravan trader. (Some of them must reflect the corrupt nature
of the occupations at that time, I imagine.)
I don’t know if the Buddha objected
to people having a military livelihood, although Buddhism has tended toward
pacifism and peacemaking. Some of you likely
heard the segment on NPR last week with Iraqi War veteran Aidan Delgado, about
his new book, put out by our own Beacon Press, called, The Sutras of Abu Ghraib.
Aidan spent some of his years
growing up in
Delgado said that the daily
degradation was the real problem, however, more than the torture that we have
seen pictured. He seemed to feel that everyone
in
When we try to find the right
livelihood, it is for many reasons, to be life promoting, to be helpful, to be spiritual,
to be called, to live meaningfully, but then there is also the other side – to not
be drawn into what will harm our spirits and the world. Few of us are in as conflicted of a
livelihood as a Buddhist guarding a prison where torture is taking place, but
most of us find our livelihoods, our occupations, challenges to the spirit at
times. There can be stress, boredom, mean-spiritedness from co-workers, anxiety, humiliation,
oppression, domination, unethical business practices, fierce competition, cruel
criticisms, temptations to selfishness, and all kinds of other harmfulness. We can find ourselves negatively affected in
ways that ripple outward into all of our relationships. A Buddhist teaching says, “Avoid the company
of deluded people when you can. When you
cannot, keep your own
counsel.” It can be hard
to avoid the company of people behaving badly in some livelihoods.
The way to decide right livelihood is
simple, and also not. Does it draw on my
passions? Does it provide for myself and my loved ones?
Do I thrive in this environment?
If the answer to these or other questions we have about how we are
occupying our time is no, does that mean we change occupations? Maybe we should, but not necessarily. It might mean that we change our own
approach, our attitude, our way of being in our livelihoods – we become more
assertive, or less so, more appreciative, less picky, more adaptable, less
crazy, more centered and at peace.
For example, not everyone is a
parent, but almost everyone who has reached adulthood has done a little
childcare at some time or another – a fairly universal livelihood for us. And one that we may not be well suited for,
but may be able to make changes in our lives in order to do it well – becoming
more patient, or creative, or whatever it takes. It’s often hard to tell what way is the best
way to right livelihood. Sometimes it’s
to change ourselves and sometimes it’s to change our occupations.
What is the right livelihood for
you? The Buddha taught that this is a
worthy question to reflect upon and to consider for how we live ethically. May you find ways to occupy your lives that
are filled with compassion and creativity, with meaningfulness and helpfulness. So may
you be at peace.